Open-Ended Everyday Science Mysteries

Everyday Science Mysteries

This is exciting news! I’ve been a fan of the Everyday Science Mysteries for a long time, but it took time to cull through each volume to get the discipline-specific activities I wanted. In response to teacher demand, NSTA recently published the books for separate content areas: Physical Science, Life Science, and Earth and Space Science.

These are great open-ended stories for your students that can lead them right into hands-on science demonstrations. In addition to the many stories included in the book are detailed explanations for how to use them and why you should. Each volume presents the following:

  • Theory Behind the Book
  • Using the Book and the Stories
  • Using this Book in Different Ways
  • Science and Literacy

But what will keep you coming back to these books time and again are the engaging stories and the science concepts they illustrate. Consider these examples:

Everyday Physical Science Mysteries

  • Grandfather’s Clock (Periodic motion and experimental design)
  • The Crooked Swing (Engineering application of pendulums, improving a product)
  • The Magic Balloon (Gas and temperature laws)

Read the free chapter: How Cold is Cold?

Everyday Life Science Mysteries

  • Flowers: More than Just Pretty (Botany)
  • What Did That Owl Eat? (Zoology)
  • The Trouble with Bubble Gum (Health, nutrition)

Read the free chapter: Seedlings in a Jar

Everyday Earth and Space Science Mysteries 

  • What’s the Moon Like Around the World? (Astronomy)
  • Where Did the Puddles Go? (Evaporation)
  • Here’s the Crusher (Atmosphere)

Read the free chapter: The Little Tent That Cried

One of the primary purposes of these books is to relieve the overburdened teacher from the exhausting work of designing inquiry lessons from scratch. Another stems from the idea that the use of open-ended stories challenge students to engage in real experimentation about real science content. With those goals in mind, enjoy these activities right along with your students.

Posted in NSTA Press Books | Tagged , , | 3 Responses

What will we do, where will we go with the NGSS?

On Tuesday, April 9, the final Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), a new set of voluntary, rigorous, and internationally benchmarked standards for K—12 science education, were released. For more information on this document and the release of the NGSS, please read the press release.  Also, if you haven’t yet downloaded your copy of the NGSS, PDFs of the standards are available and can be viewed based on topic or on disciplinary core idea.

As a participant at the National Conference on Science Education which was held in San Antonio earlier this month, there was much excitement and enthusiasm around the release of the NGSS which occurred the day before the conference started.  Prior to the conference, the Council for State Science Supervisors held their annual meeting and were having ongoing discussions about the standards, the National Science Education Leadership Association had a day long Professional Development Institute dedicated to the NGSS, and other organizations and associations, as well as commercial companies were buzzing about the release of the document.

The excitement was obvious and the enthusiasm contagious.  Conversations in sessions and throughout the different venues could be overheard as science educators were discussing the release of the document, the changes made since the previous draft, and the inevitable question of “what next?”

Which brings us to the question – “what next?” Now that the standards have been released, it is only the beginning of the journey. Dare I say this is where all leaders in all schools need to look directly into the faces of the educators they work with and say “engage” (sorry needed to go there with the whole Next Generation thing)?

But even with the bad reference, it is a good question – how do we engage all science educators and other school leaders in the discussion and implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards.  Everyone in the school district, corporation, business or informal setting can find a stake in and participate in the development and dissemination of resources as well as the implementation of this document.

An example of such connections that can be made from the NGSS to the English Language Arts and Mathematics Common Core Documents is shown in a Venn Diagram developed by Tina Cheuk of Stanford and focused on Relationships and Convergences Found in NGSS and CCSS ELA and Math.  This PDF was included as one of the recommended resources in the most recent issue of the Leaders Letter.  I personally plan to utilize this document in my methods classes next fall and also share it with colleagues who teach math methods and language arts methods classes.  We work on the idea of integration of subject areas already, assign a project for all seniors that requires the development of a cross curricular unit and discuss how integration can help topics be relevant and maximize instructional time.  Therefore it is my belief that this graphic is a great way to help my college students and colleagues see the connections.

NSTA has also begun to engage science educators with resources for the NGSS and has been for several months.  They have developed a guide to help science educators lead study groups to review the draft standards. Take a look at the slides from this session and download our guide. See also the

So back to the question, posed, what will you as a science educator do to engage all of your colleagues in the implantation of the NGSS?

Posted in The Leading Edge | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Test make-ups

I am a student teacher in sixth grade earth science. My question is about makeup exams.  I have several ideas, but can you suggest other systems or procedures for allowing students to make up exams?
—Dawn, San Jose, California

Student absences are a given. It’s frustrating when students miss a class (or two or three) due to illness, field trips, or family situations. It’s hard to find time for students to make up assignments, especially tests, labs, and projects.

In your note, you listed your ideas for students to make up a test when they return to school. Two important considerations regarding make-up tests are the format and content. Will you give the same test as a make-up or an alternate version? How will you ensure the alternate version assesses the same objectives as the original test?

Based on my experiences, I have some thoughts and questions on these ideas:

Continue reading …

Posted in Ms. Mentor | Tagged , | 1 Response

Upping the Ante: A Classroom Gas Chromatograph!

The gas chromatograph, until recently, has been a founding member in the exclusive club of scientific instrumentation that lived only in the rarified air of serious scientific laboratories. Other members of the club include the electron microscope, the mass spectrometer, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and of course the cyclotron.

Below is a picture of a mass spectrometer at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. Besides being wildly complex, it takes up the better part of a room, and leaves little to the engineer’s imagination given all the exposed wires, tubes, and components.

Mass Spectrometer at NASA JSC


For decades, a magic box was the main thing between students and real-time data collection. The magic box went by many names including Universal Lab Interface, MultiPurpose Lab Interface, Serial Box Interface, LabPro, LabQuest, GoLink, LabQuest Mini, and LabQuest2. But in all cases, the excitement over the interfaces provided students with connectivity to instrumentation that in most cases was possible through other means albeit filled with limitations. It has been a while since truly illusive classroom measurements have become possible, and the Mini GC moves the inquiry excitement beyond the interface and into the instrumentation.

Vernier_Interface_Family1

I noticed the first hints of a change in the winds of gas chromatography, or GC for short, a couple years after the terror attacks of 9/11. In discussion with a local hazardous materials team I learned that a suitcase-sized GC was onboard their truck. I just had to see it and learn about its operation. A few caveats however. First, the “suitcase” was huge and heavy, but did have a handle and hinges like a suitcase. Second, the suitcase GC cost over $100,000. Third, it was not fast or easy to use, maintain, nor inexpensive to operate. Since that time, GCs have dropped in price and size and increased in speed and number of features, but still a $55,000 13kg suitcase is out of reach of almost every high school. But drop a magnitude and the science teacher’s day just got brighter. What about a $1800 1.3kg GC that can communicate with an iPad? Now we’re talking!

The Vernier Mini GC Plus not only opens up a brave new world of high school/college-level instrumentation, but pushes the envelope of student expectations into uncharted territory; a new intellectual playspace from which there is no turning back.

Mini Gas Chromotograph Plus

I belive the Mini GC marks a conceptual change is the dedication to science teaching by a technology company. Many of us are quite happy, overwhelmed perhaps, with all the available probeware, sensors, interfaces, and output options, but the arrival of the Mini GC, whether intentional or not, has raised the bar of imagination for anyone on the delivery or receiving end of high school science.

In a nutshell, the Mini GC Plus is a real gas chromatograph that is smaller and lighter than a six-pack of pop (or soda if you live in that region of the US). The Mini GC does have some limitations in the types of samples it can process, but the mechanics and workflow are true GC.

The Vernier Mini GC Plus connects via USB to a computer running LoggerPro3, or to a LabQuest. If used with an LabQuest 2, the datastream from the Mini GC can be wirelessly collected and analyzed on an iPad running the Graphical Analysis App or viewed in a web browser.

acetone-graph

 

gc-mini_Separating-a-mixture-of-9-substances.001.800.494

 

An entire GC run can take as little as five minutes, or much longer if complex compounds are analyzed. The steps are basic since the instrument does the initial work (which is much of the magic of the elite instruments of science). When connected to Vernier software, the GC is autodetected and identified as such, and a window filled with setting choices appears. A couple microliters of a liquid are injected into the GC’s port at the same moment that the data collection run is started. As the volatiles are cooked off in the GC’s oven, a signal of concentration and duration is processed into a spike or spikes on a graph. From that point the statics features of the software can be used for further analysis.

The Mini GC, according to Vernier, “is an instrument for separating, analyzing, and identifying substances contained in a volatile liquid or gaseous sample. The Mini GC Plus can detect and distinguish between families of compounds, including alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, aromatic hydrocarbons, carboxylic acids, esters, ethers, and nitriles.”

A GC operates by heating an extremely small amount of a liquid whereby the individual compounds in the liquid separate out over time yielding both definable characteristics and percentages of the total amount of material analyzed. By cross-referencing the results with knowns, specific compounds and mixtures can be identified.

A webpage at Oregon State University describes this process well as the process being, “similar to a running race where a group of people begin at the starting line, but as the race proceeds, the runners separate based on their speed. The chemicals in the mixture separate based on their volatility. In general, small molecules travel more quickly than larger molecules.”

The workflow for analyzing acetone with the Mini GC, the LabQuest2 and an iPad is presented in the video below recorded at the Vernier exhibitor booth at the 2013 NSTA National Conference in San Antonio, TX.

Now that the Mini GC has raised the high school classroom science teaching bar to what was once an unimaginable level, we can only hope that other members of the exclusive scientific instrumentation club will be available for the cost of less than two football helmets (the Head Impact Telemetry System kind of football helmet, of course.)

YouTube Preview Image

 

Posted in Science 2.0 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What science happens in your sandbox?

A child looks at a row of cone-shaped holes in a sandbox.A pile of sand, a sandbox or a sensory table full of sand are tools for imaginative play, sensory exploration and science investigations.  In the April 2013 issue of Science and Children, the Early Years column, I wrote about how children wondered what made a series of cone-shaped pits in a line in the sandbox. Their question came after a long period of unstructured play and it inspired an investigation into how water can move sand.

Children build with wet sand at a sensory table.As children work with dry and wet sand, they notice and make use of the differences due to the properties of water:

  • Wet sand sticks together and can be made into deep holes and tall “mountains.” Footprints and other impressions are easy to make and see in wet sand.
  • Children scoop, pour, and measure dry sand in a sensory table.Dry sand can slide off a shovel and flow into a hole or fill a bucket.

The water molecules adhering to sand grains and each other aren’t visible to the children but they can explore this property, and think about how that is the same or different from the way other materials behave.

Some teachers bury small objects, such as shells, for children to discover while digging. In nature, sand and other sediments cover and bury objects and previously laid down layers of sediment.

Using a magnifier children can see the shape of the sand grains and notice different colors.

Child feels the sunlit sand.Children may notice the temperature differences between sand in direct sunlight and sand in the shade.

Impressions made by feet or objects can be filled with wet plaster of Paris (mixed by an adult in a plastic bag) and later pulled out of the sand to reveal the cast of the shape. Some fossils are formed when the space that a dead plant or animal occupied is filled with minerals over time.

Early childhood programs that have a water source that can be used with the sandbox provide an opportunity for children to create and observe water flow. As children work, ask them to tell you what they notice is happening. Record their words, have them write or draw about their observations. This documentation, along with their recollection of the experiences, is their evidence for any statements they make about the properties of sand and the force of moving water. Talking about what they observe is an important part of learning. Sharing their ideas about why and how is part of “doing science.”

These early childhood investigations and experiences support later learning about properties of liquids, engineering design, earth science concepts such as erosion and sedimentation, energy, forces and motion, and systems. Take a look at the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) for K-grade 2 and see how the performance expectations (and the practices, core ideas and crosscutting concepts they were developed from) are supported by sandbox play and investigations. The NSTA has guides to the NGSS to help us use them in teaching children from early childhood and up.

Posted in Early Years | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Responses

Including Students With Disabilities in Advanced Science Classes

Including Students with Disabilities in Advanced Science ClassesThe 2013 National Science Foundation (NSF) report Women, Minorities, and Persons With Disabilities in Science and Engineering indicates that “U.S. citizens and permanent residents earned higher numbers of science and engineering (S&E) doctorates in 2009 than they did in 1999. Since 2008, they’ve earned more doctorates in S&E fields than in non-S&E fields.” In 2010, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued the  Encouraging Minorities to Pursue Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Careers briefing.

These efforts indicate that more and more high school science teachers are and will be teaching students with disabilities in advanced science classes. If you teach Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), or honors science courses, you are likely experienced and knowledgeable about science, but you may have little or no experience with special education. Conversely, many special education teachers have little or no experience in teaching advanced science courses.

In their newly published book, Including Students With Disabilities in Advanced Science Classesauthors Lori Howard and Elizabeth Potts explain that advanced or accelerated courses are not usually team taught with a special education teacher and that those teachers may not have ready access to special educators to share strategies for fostering success for those students with disabilities.

This book is a unique resource for teachers of advanced science courses. The authors break down the essentials as follows:

  • Basic Special Education Terms and Laws
  • Working with the Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) Team
  • Classroom Considerations: Behavior and Instruction
  • Labs
  • Assistive Technology and Your Classroom

The openness and willingness of teachers to welcome students with disabilities into the classroom is often identified as a key component for student success. As I read this book, I wondered what teachers facing this situation for the first time would be most concerned about. If  you have already taught students with disabilities in your advanced science classes, how would you advise someone to prepare? What was your experience?

Note: This book is also available as an e-book.

Posted in NSTA Press Books | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The history of our planet

One of the themes in several articles and blogs I’ve read makes the case that the study of earth science should not stop at the end of middle school! Illustrating this, the final version of the Next Generation Science Standards were released last week, and the NSTA journals continue a discussion with The NGSS and the Earth and Space Sciences. If the study doesn’t end with middle school, it certainly starts in Kindergarten and Pre-K, as exemplified in the featured articles this month.

The authors of The Dynamic Earth: Recycling Naturally* describe a comprehensive 5E lesson on changes in the Earth system. The focus of the five days is on how rocks form from other materials and how they can change (or recycle) through various processes. The article includes photos of the young geologists and ideas for discussion and investigation. [SciLinks: Rock Cycle, Rock Classification, Types of Rocks, Identifying Rocks and Minerals]

Have you ever watched a child picking up and examining rocks? Even pebbles in a parking lot or nearby park can be fascinating. Digging Into Rocks With Young Children* shows how to capitalize on this interest and uncover any misconceptions or confusion students have. The lessons range from observing and identifying properties of rocks to modeling changes in rocks through weathering. The article includes photos of the young geologists at work and samples of their data sheets. This month’s Formative Assessment Probe Is It a Rock?* takes another look at student misconceptions. With the probe itself, discussion, and the use of the Frayer Model, students work collaboratively to organize their knowledge and observations of rocks and rock-like materials. [SciLinks: Rocks, Composition of Rocks]

Continue reading …

Posted in SciLinks | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The last sessions

photo(10)

The Sci-agrams team

You’re ecstatic when your conference session proposal is accepted. And then you learn that you have a Sunday morning time slot, in competition with early departures, church services, hotel brunches, and last-minute sightseeing or souvenir-gathering. You predict 2-3 participants at best or an empty room at worst. Is it worth the planning and preparation?

But never fear–Science teachers work on the weekends! The die-hards at the convention center this morning were treated to some excellent presentations.

The 40+ sttendees at the Sci-agrams session, presented by a team from New York City, left with an I-can-do-this attitude. The team of presenters from several schools, guided us through a process of drawing accurate diagrams in science. “I can’t draw” is not an excuse! You can see more of their work in the November 2012 issue of Science & Children Drawing Out the Artist in Science Students.

Sissy Wong

Sissy Wong

One of the best discussions I ever had at a conference session was during the session Mentor-Mentee Dialogues: Fostering the Development of Beginning Science Teachers–the last session of the conference. The presenter described her research on new teachers/student teachers’ perceptions of their work and progress toward becoming more reflective and student-centered. She gave use some case studies and asked us (in small groups) to analyze the situations and offer suggestions and advise to the novice teacher. The 20+ in attendance included veteran teachers, administrators, student teaching supervisors, and some teachers with less than 5 years themselves. The variety of responses from these perspectives was fascinating and informative.

Thanks to all of the presenters (especially those with early morning, late afternoon, Sunday, and at-the-same-time-as-Bill-Nye time slots). Your willingness to share your experiences and expertise is much appreciated.

 

 

Posted in Conferences | Tagged | 2 Responses

Connections

At a session this morning, when the presenters described the agenda it was not exactly what was described in the program. I was already familiar with the topic, so I slipped out. Since other sessions had already started, I decided to use the time on the exhibit floor. As I was browsing, I stopped at the booth of the Royal Society of Chemistry and struck up a conversation with another attendee.I found out that he had worked with Don Herbert, TVs Mister Wizard. Mr. Wizard was one of my childhood heroes, so I felt a connection. He also mentioned that one of his science instructors had himself been a student of Marie Curie’s. So I know someone who knew someone who knew Marie Curie! Another distant connection. But those who met Bill Nye on Thursday have a direct connection to a science superhero!

Other connections are geographical. I met educators from all over the US, as well as Nova Scotia, Ontario, Alberta, the UK, Australia, the Bahamas, and Taiwan!

Posted in Conferences | Tagged | Leave a comment

Scientists Talk

Corporate Scientists with NSTA's David Evans and Damaries Blondonville “It’s IMPOSSIBLE not to love science!” That’s what Dr. Rui Vogt Aives de Cruz told a group of several hundred science teachers Thursday at NSTA’s National Conference on Science Education. He and four other representatives from some of America’s top STEM employers urged them to communicate that message to their students.

Moderated by NSTA’s Executive Director Dr. David L. Evans, NSTA’s New Science Teacher Academy hosted a roundtable discussion focused on how we make science real for students, and how we can connect scientists with students. Speakers included Dr. Larry Sernyk, from Dow; Dr. Mark Land, from Bayer; Dr. Rui Vogt Aives de Cruz, from Dow; Amy L. Gowder , from Lockheed Martin; and Jenny M. Kite, from Astellas.

New science teacher asking the panel a questionWhy is this important? Jenny M. Kite told us what we all need to remember: Students will drive tomorrow’s innovation! Amy L. Gowder  explained that 75% of Lockheed Martin employees need a science background, they need engineers, and it’s critical to the future of their company to have a pipeline. Rui Vogt Aives de Cruz made his passion for STEM clear and urged teachers to communicate their love of science to students, to show how science is applicable to their lives. Mark Land from Bayer (“we’re more than just aspirin!”) credited great teachers for getting him where he is today. Larry Sernyk from Dow echoed the praise for teachers, saying they were vital to his career.

So what were some of the suggestions? If a teacher wants to approach a company to see if they can make connections between scientists and students, the panel recommended that teachers do a little legwork in advance—really think about what you want to accomplish and how a scientist could help. For instance, do you want someone to talk at career day? Or would you like your class to have a tour of a lab? Do you want them to explain how they got where they are? Are you looking for a specific kind of scientist who can explain a topic to your class?

The teachers asked questions, such as “How can you get students interested who may not pursue a 4-year degree”? The panel had a host of ideas—among them to let students shadow a scientist, and to show them careers that require STEM training, but not necessarily a 4-year degree. And in fact, when students start out pursuing a technical degree and become enthralled with the subject, they often go on to get a 4-year degree, or even go beyond.

The take-home message was for teachers to bring fresh ideas. Teachers know best what will appeal to students, and they should share them with companies that require their workers to have STEM training.

To learn more about the New Science Teacher Academy, which brings together these innovative companies and new science teachers, please go to: http://www.nsta.org/academy/. If you are a new science teacher or know someone who is, please consider the fellowship program—they are now accepting applications!

Posted in NSTA Reports | Tagged , | 2 Responses