Chasing bubbles

Child reaches for bubbles on a snowy dayAs the weather turns colder with the changing season, some children come to school without enough layers to be warm during outside playtime. Games and engaging activities can keep children moving, warming them as they stay active. Blowing and chasing bubbles encourages children to stay in motion. If the bubble solution you bought last summer is not holding up and bubbles don’t last, try making your own solution.

The most widely recommended solution combines water, liquid dish detergent, and glycerine. Some recipes call for adding corn syrup or other form of sugar but it may leave a sticky residue. Many recipes call for Dawn dishwashing liquid to make the longest lasting bubbles. 

Bubbles forming in the water table.Materials Safety Data Sheets list the necessary safety information for products such as soap and glycerin. These products do not require any special precautions, however, guided by the experience of getting soap in my eyes, I encourage children to wear goggles while mixing bubble solution or if they fling it about when working hard to make bubbles.

Blowing bubbles is both fun and an experience with a natural phenomena. The National Wildlife Federation’s Family Fun pages suggests we use bubbles as a way to tell which direction the wind is blowing from in the “Watch Weather” activity. Scientific American describes how to do a fair test of 3 different recipes in “Blow the Best Bubbles: A soapy chemistry challenge from Science Buddies.” Spoiler alert! Don’t read to the end of their column until you do your own test and have thought about your own results. The Exploratorium in San Francisco is a “public learning laboratory exploring the world through science, art, and human perception.” Their resources include hands-on, teacher-tested Science Snacks such as the “Bubble Tray,” and a page of bubble formula.

See the delight a child feels at being a competent bubble-blower on The Regents’ Center for Early Developmental Education  (CEESTEM) at the University of Northern Iowa short video. The CEESTEM’s “Bubble” page shares many ideas for investigating bubbles and offers safety tips.

Bubble blowing is favored by occupational and speech therapists as a fun and productive activity for children. Share your bubble experiences with the families of your students so they can explore bubble formation scientifically, like the family in ExpeRimental’s video, “Giant Bubbles,” brought to you by the Royal Institution of Great Britain.

Child wearing goggles uses an electric mixer to make soap foam.Children of all ages can enjoy watching, making and altering bubbles. Preschoolers can explore what happens to a bubble solution when either salt, sugar, honey or paint is added. The Colorado Department of Education, Colorado State Library has pages on bubble activities for people from babies to adults. Children enjoy using electric mixers as part of my newest favorite bubble play—making foam! See the Early Years column, “Blowing Bubbles” in the January issue of Science and Children for more about ways to make and explore foam.

While the mechanics and chemistry of bubbles is fascinating,  young children gain the most information in a developmentally appropriate way through experience.

Posted in Early Years | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are You Planning Schoolwide or Community-wide Programs for the August 2017 Solar Eclipse

blog header reading "NSTA Virtual Conference The Total Solar Eclipse of 2017 Are You and Your Students Ready for the Sky Event of the Decade?"

Solar Science bookAndrew Fraknoi and I, co-authors of the new NSTA Press book Solar Science: Exploring Sunspots, Seasons, Eclipses and More, want to learn more about what teachers plan to do for the August 21, 2017, eclipse.  We are specifically interested in learning about teachers who plan to encourage their students to provide programming (e.g. showing safe observing techniques, demonstrating what causes eclipses) for other students in the school, or for members of the community.  Please send a brief description of your plans to Dennis Schatz at if you will be doing schoolwide or community-wide programs.  We plan to produce a resource guide of good ideas  for educators who want to serve their schools and community in this way.  (If the eclipse is not yet on your radar, you can read more about it in NSTA’s free booklet.)

Thanks for your help.

Dennis Schatz and Andrew Fraknoi

PS – If you are still trying to determine what to do to prepare your students to experience the eclipse, you may want to participate in NSTA’s Virtual Conference: Total Solar Eclipse of 2017 – Are You and Your Students Ready for the Sky Event of the Decade? 


Dennis Schatz was for many years the Senior Vice President of the Pacific Science Center in Seattle, and is the author of 23 science books for children. He was program director for science education at the National Science Foundation from 2011 to 2015, before returning to Pacific Science Center as Senior Advisor.  (See for more information)

Andrew FraknoiAndrew Fraknoi is the Chair of the Astronomy Department at Foothill College in the San Francisco Bay Area and a former Executive Director of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.  He is the lead author of a college astronomy textbook and appears frequently on local and national radio programs explaining astronomical developments.

Solar Science is published by NSTA Press and is available in the NSTA Science Store.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

Future NSTA Conferences

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon


Posted in NSTA Learning Center, NSTA Press Books | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Legislative Update: ESSA, Money, and More



FY2017 Appropriations: Congress passed a stopgap spending measure on Weds Sept. 28—two whole days before the Sept. 30 midnight deadline that would have shut down the federal government–that will maintain current funding levels for federal education programs and keep the government open until Dec. 9. 

Members of Congress have left town and are back home to campaign for the November 8 election.  When the lame duck Congress returns after the election, job one will be to finalize a FY2017 spending bill before the continuing resolution on Dec. 9 runs out.

In anticipation of final Congressional action on FY2017 appropriations bills the NSTA, several state science groups, and other members of the Title IV Coalition recently sent this letter to Senate appropriators, requesting full funding for the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Title IV in the final bill. As reported in earlier Legislative Updates, the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee approved $1 billion for the ESSA Title IV block grants in their FY2017 Labor HHS and Education spending bill.  This amount is $500 million above the President’s budget request and $700 million above the Senate funding ($300m).  The program is authorized at $1.65 billion.

ESSA Title IV provides funding to both states and districts so they may provide students with programs (including STEM programs) that ensure a well-rounded education. Read more about Title IV.

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Implementation—What’s in Your State? Per the new federal education law, state and district leaders must engage in meaningful consultation with a broad range of stakeholders including families, students, educators, private school officials, and community partners when developing state accountability plans and deciding on the use of ESSA funding. States are required to submit their individual plans for ESSA by March, so there will be a lot of activity in the coming months as state boards of education and governors review and discuss state plans. Many believe that the new state plans now being developed will shape the direction of education for the next ten years. Do you know what your state is doing in preparation for ESSA? Teachers and especially state and district leaders are urged to find out more and get involved early; here is a great resource on ESSA and a state activity map:

ED Issues Guidance on ESSA Title II—Earlier this week the Education Department released guidelines on how states and school districts can use federal funding under the ESSA Title II to better support teachers.  The guidance addresses ways states and districts can use Title II, Part A funds to support

  • Multiple Pathways to Teaching and Leading;
  • Induction and Mentorship; 
  •  Meaningful Evaluation and Support; 
  •  Strong Teacher Leadership; and
  •  Transformative School Leadership; 

Title II grants go to every state, which in turn are required to provide up to 94 percent of the funding as subgrants to local districts for programs that support teachers and schools leaders. Districts can elect to use the funds to “provide professional development and other comprehensive systems of support for teachers, principals, or other school leaders to promote high-quality instruction and instructional leadership in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics subjects.” The Title II A guidance calls for “significant teacher input into the application and planning process for local subgrants (districts). This approach would give educators, parents and community members a meaningful role in determining the best use of program funds to both improve professional practice and help make schools great places to work.” (Watch for a deeper dive on this in future Legislative Updates)

Webinar on ESSA: Need to know more about ESSA? Join NSTA, state leaders, teachers, and STEM professionals for a 90 minute joint webinar on the new federal education law and its impact on K-12 STEM education, Wednesday, October 5 at 6:30 pm. Speakers during this interactive webinar–co-sponsored by the NSTA, the STEM Education Coalition, and STEMx—will discuss key STEM provisions in the Every Student Succeeds Act, and how stakeholders can help to advocate and support continued STEM learning in their communities. Learn more about the webinar and register here.


NSTA President-elect Dr. David Crowther and Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval at the ‘Year of STEM’ proclamation at Sparks High School.

And finally . . .

Governor Brian Sandoval signed a proclamation declaring the 2016-2017 school year the ‘Year of STEM education’ in Nevada during a recent visit to Sparks High School. NSTA President-elect Dr. David Crowther was at the launch of the statewide initiative, where Gov. Sandoval also introduced various ways for students, families and educators to actively participate. Learn more about the initiative here.

Jodi Peterson is Assistant Executive Director of Legislative Affairs for the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) and Chair of the STEM Education Coalition. e-mail Peterson at; follow her on Twitter at @stemedadvocate.

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon
Posted in Legislative Update | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Spark Science Learning Through Children’s Trade Books

Research points to the benefits to student learning that come from teaching reading in the content areas, such as in science class. The National Research Council noted in a summary report of their workshop Literacy for Science that “when students have a reason to read, a reason to learn terminology, and compelling and interesting content, their level of engagement increases, as well as their stamina and cognitive effort.” Give your students new reasons to read by incorporating captivating science texts in your lessons. Add the newest NSTA Kids books or selections from NSTA’s annual list of Outstanding Science Trade Books for Students, K–12 to your classroom library this fall. 

Explore New NSTA Kids Books

Notable Notebooks: Scientists and Their Writings, by Jessica Fries-Gaither, will inspire young scientists with its colorful and lively glimpses inside the notebooks of famous scientists such as Galileo and Jane Goodall. After learning the many ways scientists use their notebooks to sketch observations, record data, or jot their thoughts, students can follow the four steps provided to launch their own journals of discovery. Browse sample pages of this fascinating new children’s book from one of the authors of NSTA’s award-winning elementary-level book Inquiring Scientists, Inquiring Readers. Notable Notebooks cover
From Flower to Fruit, by Richard and Kathleen Konicek-Moran, draws readers in with the twin charms of rich illustrations and an engaging narrative to explore the mysteries of how seeds become plants and the importance of flowers in every ecosystem. Six kid-friendly activities and background information for parents and teachers complement the text. See these sample pages to glimpse the wonders awaiting budding botanists in this new resource. Richard Konicek-Moran is author of the popular NSTA Press series Everyday Science Mysteries.  From Fruit to Flower book cover
 Next Time You See a Cloud, by Emily Morgan, reveals some fascinating science behind the beautiful displays of ever-changing clouds we see in the sky. The book answers all kinds of questions: What are clouds made of? Why are some clouds white? Which clouds mean fair weather is coming, and which ones mean rain is on the way? Take a look inside at the beautiful photos and detailed information conveyed in this new book in the award-winning Next Time You See series.  Next Time You See a Cloud book cover
For additional science resources for curious kids, explore more books in the award-winning NSTA Kids series. And be sure to check out the extensive list of Outstanding Science Trade Books for Students, K–12, selected each year by NSTA and the Children’s Book Council.
NSTA Press also provides a wealth of lessons on how to incorporate children’s trade books and other texts into science class through the Picture-Perfect Science series; Teaching Science Through Trade Books; Inquiring Scientists, Inquiring Readers for elementary grades; the forthcoming Inquiring Scientists, Inquiring Readers in Middle School; Once Upon a Life Science Book; and Once Upon an Earth Science Book.

Special Fall Savings From NSTA Press

Between now and November 1, 2016, save $15 off your order of $75 or more of NSTA Press books or e-books by entering promo code BKS16 at checkout in theonline Science Store. Offer valid only on orders placed for NSTA Press books or e-books on the web and may not be combined with any other offer.

NSTA’s Book Beat is also emailed as a monthly e-newsletter designed to keep NSTA Press® readers, and the wider audience of science teachers, informed about books and teacher resources available through the National Science Teachers Association. Each month’s issue highlights selected topics in science education and new content in NSTA Press books with links to free sample chapters and lessons. NSTA’s Book Beat also informs readers of special offers and discounts available through the NSTA Science Store. Click here to view past issues or to sign up to receive future issues.

Posted in NSTA's Book Beat | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Integrating science and engineering

12722794783_496414e7e8_mIn my elementary schedule, I barely have time for science, and now I’m concerned about teaching engineering, too. I’ve never studied engineering. Can you suggest some resources? —T., New Jersey

You might feel a little more confident after reading “The Next Generation Science Standards and Engineering for Young Learners: Beyond Bridges and Egg Drops”  from the October 2013 issue of NSTA’s elementary journal, Science and Children (S&C). The article has a chart comparing science and engineering practices, and you can see the overlaps and similarities. It seems that the thinking involved in inquiry and problem solving are similar, whether students are investigating natural phenomenon (science) or applying their knowledge to design products or processes to solve a problem or need (engineering).

In her blog, Early education in engineering and design, Peggy Ashbrook examines the engineering skills that even our youngest students already have. She provides insights, resources, and suggestions for building on these.

The Engineering Encounters column in S&C includes strategies that integrate engineering with science, support teaching children how to design solutions, and explore the ways engineers conduct their work.

Other S&C articles describe lessons with engineering components, too, and most lessons include a chart showing the connections to science and engineering practices in the Next Generation Science Standards.

You’re not alone in your concern. Most science teachers don’t have a background in engineering per se, so have fun with your young engineers and learn along with them!



Posted in Ms. Mentor | Tagged , , | 2 Responses

Navigating a New Role

This year, as a science supervisor, I will be observing teachers. I’m not sure whether I should interact with them during classroom visits if I see something that could be improved. How involved should I be? —J., Pennsylvania

You have a wonderful opportunity to observe (and learn from) a variety of teachers and share your expertise.

Discuss with your administrator what your role(s) should be: evaluator, mentor, observer, or coach. How often are you expected to visit each classroom? How long are your observations (a whole class period vs. a brief walk-through)? Are there protocols or procedures you are expected to follow? These parameters can determine how involved you become, and your rapport with the teachers will depend on whether they see you as an intrusive administrator or a trusted colleague.

When you’re in a classroom, intervene immediately if you notice a safety issue. Otherwise, be discreet. You don’t want to undermine the teacher or react to an event without knowing the context. You can call a teacher’s attention to something without interrupting the class. Perhaps while students are working, you could have a quiet chat with the teacher or give the teacher a note.

Afterwards, reflect on your observations before meeting with the teacher. How will they help the teacher improve instruction or relationships with students? As an observer/evaluator, I would debrief with teachers with discussion-starting questions: How did you know that students were engaged? What would happen if…? Did you notice that…? What happened right before I came in? What happened after I left?

The supervisory process is time-consuming, but reflection and face-to-face discussions can make it worthwhile for everyone.

[The article, “Should Supervisors Intervene During Classroom Visits?” (Kappan, October 2015) has a good discussion on in-class coaching.]


Posted in Ms. Mentor | Tagged | 2 Responses

How to Evaluate NGSS Lessons and Units with the New Improved EQuIP Rubric for Science

text-based headerThe Educators Evaluating the Quality of Instructional Products (EQuIP) Rubric for science provides criteria by which to measure the degree to which lessons and units are designed for the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). The rubric is a joint project of Achieve, Inc., and NSTA and was originally released shortly after the NGSS were finalized.

The purpose of the rubric and review process is to: (1) review existing lessons and units to determine what revisions are needed; (2) provide constructive criterion-based feedback and suggestions for improvement to developers; (3) identify exemplars/models for teachers’ use within and across states; and (4) to inform the development of new lessons, units, and other instructional materials. 

Revisions were recently made to the rubric. Matt Krehbiel, assistant director of science for Achieve, Inc., highlights some of the changes in the following Q&A. 

Q: What are the major changes that were made to the rubric?

A: The two biggest changes in the rubric are the addition of a scoring guide to the response form and the reorganization of criteria in the first two categories of the rubric. The details of these and other changes are outlined in Rubric Changes for Version 3.0 online.

Q: Why were the changes made?

A: The scoring guide was added to support the evaluation of lessons and units in a more concrete way. This version of the rubric will be used to vet lessons and units by the Peer Review Panel with the goal of identifying and sharing high quality lessons designed for the NGSS. The scoring guide supports the process of selecting high quality examples.

The criteria were reorganized to provide greater clarity about what designing lessons and units for the NGSS really looks like. While training thousands of educators to use the EQuIP Rubric for Science, we have observed where people struggle to understand the intent of the criteria and revised these sections for greater clarity.

Q: How were the changes made?

A: It was a team effort. Feedback from the thousands of educators using the EQuIP Rubric for Science across the United States was combined with feedback from those leading professional learning using the rubric and the revisions were guided by the same group of experts that authored previous versions of the EQuIP Rubric for Science. It was a year-long, iterative process that included piloting several drafts with groups of teachers for specific feedback on the clarity and utility of the changes.

Q: What does the new rubric allow me to do?

A: The new rubric allows for a more specific conversation about what is “quality” in terms of designing lessons and units for the NGSS. Together with professional learning support, the new rubric helps users become better able to identify lessons and units that are designed for the NGSS, better able to revise lessons and units of their own, and helps deepen their understanding of the standards themselves and what they expect of students and teachers. It is important to note that the rubric is best used within a community and, when used this way, it can also establish or reinforce a common language and understanding for what high quality lessons and units designed for the NGSS look like.

text-based header: Matt KrehbielMatt Krehbiel is Assistant Director of Science for Achieve, Inc. Reach him at and follow him on twitter at @ksscienceguy.



Visit NSTA’s NGSS@NSTA Hub for hundreds of vetted classroom resources, professional learning opportunities, publications,ebooks and more; connect with your teacher colleagues on the NGSS listservs (members can sign up here); and join us for discussions around NGSS at an upcoming conference.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

Future NSTA Conferences

2016 Area Conferences

2016 National Conference

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon


Posted in Next Generation Science Standards | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ideas and information from NSTA’s September K-12 journals

Start off the school year with ideas and resources from your NSTA colleagues.

Science and ChildrenSharing Products: Science Exhibitions and Beyond

The featured articles this month describe how teachers and students can go beyond traditional replicas and science fairs to create products and processes that showcase their learning and problem-solving skills (and their creativity)

For more on the content that provides a context for these projects and strategies see the SciLinks topics Arachnida, Bioluminescence, Buoyancy, Current Electricity, Electric Current, How does nature reuse materials?, Insects, Nutrition, Parts of a Plant, Plants as Food, Watersheds.

Posted in SciLinks | Leave a comment

Safety, risk and hazards

As preschool and child care continue and a new school year begins, it’s a good time to refresh our memories about safety practices.

Children wearing goggles as they make borax & glue "slime"Goggles are not common in early childhood programs but they should be. Children love to dress up and goggles add to the “realness” of their science exploration. We use goggles when we make “slime” (The Early Years: Nurturing Young Chemists, 2006). One never knows when a planned activity will be taken in a new direction by a child’s actions. As part of a sensory investigation, I planned for children to try to identify a food item by its scent. Four foods, lemon (fruit), cinnamon sticks (bark), onion (bulb), and coffee beans (seeds), were in small opaque containers covered with squares of cloth so the children could smell but not see them. We used the “wafting” technique of waving the air towards our noses so we didn’t press them up against the cloth and share germs. So far, all was good. When we removed the cloth, children could see and identify the items or confirm their guess. One child looked into the container of cinnamon sticks and then blew into it. Small bits of cinnamon lofted into the air and into his eyes. Like sand grains, the bits were sharp and could have scratched his cornea (but didn’t). From then on we wore goggles during this activity and many others, such as when making playdough, because of the possibility of salt grains scratching children’s corneas.

The Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research’s “Eye injury: Tips to protect vision” has many suggestions. A cause for eye injury that I wasn’t aware of is flying rubber bands. Children use rubber bands in all sorts of ways once they are old enough not to chew on them.

Take a look at Ken Roy’s column, “Safety First: Safer Science Explorations for Young Children” in the March 2015 issue of Science and Children, to learn how to prepare for safer science explorations. Then read his blog posts to see how safety practices begun in early childhood are the beginning of what teachers (and children) will need to be aware of in upper grades.  

In “Risky Play and Children’s Safety: Balancing Priorities for Optimal Child Development” published in the International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health [9(9): 3134–3148], the authors discuss whether imposing too many restrictions on children’s outdoor risky play may be hampering their development. They state that “it is timely and important to reflect on our approach towards safety with respect to children’s outdoor risky play opportunities and to consider the impact on healthy child development.” They encourage an approach that “focuses on eliminating hazards, which Wallach (1992) defines as a source of harm that is not obvious to the child, such that the potential for injury is hidden, such as a broken railing; but does not eliminate all risks, which involve a situation that allows the child to recognize and evaluate the challenge and decide on a course of action that is not dangerous, but may still involve an element of risk.”

The Alliance for Childhood organization “promotes policies and practices that support children’s healthy development, love of learning, and joy in living.” Their publication, Adventure: The value of risk in children’s playby Joan Almon, is an introduction to the topic of adventurous play and risk. It could be a good read for a staff and parent book discussion.

As I watch young neighborhood children running with sticks and crossing the residential street by themselves, I think, “As a teacher I would never allow that to happen, but as a parent I did.” As a parent I was okay with a certain amount of risk because I was the one who would have to take my child to the doctor for any injury. The Center for Disease Control says, “most child injuries can be prevented” and offers suggestions on how Child's face with scrapes after a fall while playing the hokey pokeyinjuries can be prevented. One of my neighboring children has an arm cast for a break that happened during tumbling with a slightly older sibling. Another child got these scrapes on his face while playing the Hokey Pokey! We can be aware of hazards but children will still face risks, and learn from these encounters.

In addition to protecting children’s safety, do you protect yourself? How do you protect your eyes when pouring bleach to make the solution for sanitizing tables? Do you wash hands as frequently as we ask children to? What are your safety measures and stories? I’m feeling virtuous because I just got a flu shot! 

Wallach F. 1992. Playground safety: What did we do wrong? Park. Recreat. 1992;27:52–57.

Posted in Early Years | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Changes in How We See Scientific Inquiry

text-based header

Ask 20 teachers what scientific inquiry is and it’s possible you’ll receive 20 different answers. From a series of proscribed steps to a lab-based free-for-all, conceptions have shifted over time. In the National Research Council’s (NRC) 1996 National Science Education Standards (NSES), inquiry held a prominent position as its own content area, but the term rarely comes up in its 2012 Framework for K–12 Science Education (Framework). What Ever Happened to Scientific Inquiry, a report by the Midwest Comprehensive Center and myself, details how notions of inquiry have changed in recent history, particularly as seen within the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). A further section of the report that won’t be described here analyzes how the science standards of upper Midwest states describe inquiry.

In preparing this report, we reviewed articles about science inquiry from both current and historical perspectives, analyzed national science standards and related documents, and interviewed national science education experts.

Historical beginnings

In the early 20th century, John Dewey proposed a list of five steps scientists use in their work, intending to emphasize their reflective work practices, but educators instead interpreted those ideas as the five linear steps to doing science. Pedagogy and curricula through the 20th century showed the increasing popularity of labs with proscribed procedures and the idea of a set “scientific method.”  

Standards era shift

In 1993, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Benchmarks of Science Literacy clearly pushed on this idea of a set method and discussed inquiry as a “habit of mind.” The 1996 NSES attempted to further clarify notions of inquiry with the five big ideas of inquiry in its own section of the content standards. With a follow-up report, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards (2000), the NRC stated that, “Students do not come to understand inquiry simply by learning words such as ‘hypothesis’ and ‘inference’ or by memorizing procedures such as ‘the steps of the scientific method.’”. In the NSES, inquiry instead described the way scientists study the world and build explanations based on evidence.

Teachers nevertheless continued to use the scientific method as a convenient way to organize scientific investigations and what it means to think like a scientist, and instructional materials supported this approach. Textbooks today continue to include separate chapters on a scientific method. According to Dr. Joe Krajcik, a member of the NGSS writing team, “While well intentioned, when the National Science [Education] Standards assigned inquiry to its own separate content area, it meant that inquiry remained separate from other science learning.” And, thus, got its own chapter in the textbook! Therefore, as noted by Dr. Melissa Braaten, a professor at the University of Colorado-Boulder, “In schools, inquiry had come to mean one narrow image of doing formulaic, defined experiments. Teachers would refer to it as ‘the scientific method’ like it was a titled thing.”

Framework and the NGSS

The writers of the Framework and consequent NGSS aimed to clarify ideas of scientific practice, moving away from varying ideas of “inquiry.” As emphasized by Dr. Helen Quinn, a researcher with the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and chair of the NRC Framework committee, “While it is what we do—we inquire—scientists do not use the term inquiry.”

To summarize, in this report we emphasize four big ideas from the Framework and NGSS that take the place of some traditional conceptions of inquiry:

1) Inquiry is a means for constructing scientific understanding; it’s not a content area

Students should be involved in asking questions and investigating natural phenomena in the world around them. Instead of learning steps of a scientific method, they’re doing science.

2) Inquiry is a fluid set of practices that scientists use

As Dr. Krajcik notes, “Having the eight practices doesn’t mean that you start with a question, then move on to the next practice… There is no linearity implied. The practices are tied together and any one of them could lead to another.” Further, when working with the practices or discussing their use as a class, they shouldn’t be numbered.

3) Inquiry involves three-dimensional learning

The science and engineering practices are the means to gain scientific knowledge while investigating phenomena with a lens of the crosscutting concepts. Or, in other words from Matt Krehbiel, assistant director of science at Achieve, Inc., inquiry is “woven into science learning throughout the year, where practices are exercised and integrated with learning of the crosscutting concepts and disciplinary core ideas.”

4) Inquiry is independent from science pedagogy

Inquiry-based teaching is essential, but it’s not the only appropriate type of instruction. Varying instructional practices based on student learning needs make sense.

Final thoughts

I’m certainly not suggesting that you shouldn’t do inquiry-based lessons; however, I would suggest that you rip out the chapter of your textbook on the scientific method and consider ways to structure labs beyond hypothesis testing. There are as many ways to “do science” as there are scientists, so allow the practices to infuse your instruction where they naturally and logically fit rather than in any prescribed way. 


A former middle school science teacher and education researcher, Kevin J. B. Anderson, PhD, NBCT, is the Science Education Consultant at the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

Visit NSTA’s NGSS@NSTA Hub for hundreds of vetted classroom resources, professional learning opportunities, publications, ebooks and more; connect with your teacher colleagues on the NGSS listservs (members can sign up here); and join us for discussions around NGSS at an upcoming conference.

The mission of NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in science teaching and learning for all.

Future NSTA Conferences

2016 Area Conferences

2016 National Conference

Follow NSTA

Facebook icon Twitter icon LinkedIn icon Pinterest icon G+ icon YouTube icon Instagram icon
Posted in Next Generation Science Standards | Tagged , , | 14 Responses